Nazi Lauck NSDAP-AO Nazi Questions and Answers . . .

Nazi Lauck NSDAP/AO

Nazi Questions and Answers by A.V. Schaerffenberg

What is "Nazism"?

It is a contraction of "National Socialism", a world ideology, whose central tenet is the preservation of the White-Aryan Race. The struggle for its permanence is the most important ever undertaken by mankind, because it is nothing less than a life-or-death fight for our existence. National Socialists believe the United States can only survive as a white nation, because only the White Race is capable of creating civilized society. Yet, their first loyalty belongs to White men and women throughout the world, regardless of where they may reside. Our race – not a specific piece of geography, and certainly no government – is our nation. As the British National Socialist martyr, William Joyce, put it so succinctly, "If you love your nation, you are a racial nationalist. If you love your White society, you are a social racist. Be a National Socialist!

What do you mean by the word "Aryan"?

An "Aryan" is a White person of European, non-Jewish descent. We owe our supreme loyalty to our Aryan family, because everything we are, as individuals and as members of a civilized society, we have inherited from our race. The dissolution of Western Civilization is in direct proportion to its infection by non-Aryans.

Why do you use the Swastika?

It is the hallmark of the White-Aryan Race. That was why Adolf Hitler chose it as the emblem of his Aryan ideology. Earliest examples have been found in the Caucasus Mountains of Central Asia, where the "Caucasian" peoples dwelt more than nine thousand years ago. It has since been used by ancient Greeks, Romans, Vikings and every Aryan people from early in their history, because all of them belonged to the same race it originally symbolized. In the ancient Aryan language, Sanskrit, "Swastika" means "the good luck sign", and was associated with light. It is fitting, then, that it continues to exemplify the National Socialist worldview of racial enlightenment.

Why would anyone want a Nazi dictatorship?

National Socialism is a racial, not a political idea in the ordinary sense. It holds that the value of any government is determined primarily by its ability to preserve its Aryan citizens against racial and cultural decay. Adolf Hitler was voted into office and subsequently achieved power through the overwhelmingly popular support of the German people. Their own traditions demanded that he rule in a particular fashion. For the Germans, his military-style government was in keeping with their traditions of Bismarck or Frederick the Great. The British feel most comfortable with their parliamentary heritage, and the United States was conceived as a Constitutional Republic. All peoples must be free to determine the type of government which best reflects their unique national character and social issues, which vary from land to land. A "one-size-fits-all democracy" is nothing more than a propaganda ruse to veil the real agendas of tyrants posing as elected representatives.

The goal of the National Socialist Revolution is not to overturn these various governments, but to purge them of all their anti-Aryan elements, and re-direct them to the fundamental purpose each share in common; namely, the protection and preservation of the Aryan Race. The dissolution of Western Civilization is in direct proportion to its infection by non-Aryans. Government is, therefore, a means to an end --- a shield over a people’s continued existence. As Adolf Hitler said, "regimes come and go. Race endures."

You call yourselves "Socialists". Does that mean you want a state-run economy?

National Socialists believe in free enterprise and the rights of private property, not government intervention, save only to ensure fair play between capital and labor. We oppose capitalists, because they abuse their power by stifling competition and achieve economic domination at the expense of workers and consumers alike. After the Soviet Union fell, financial wizards, known as oligarches, typified capitalism. While they became rich, like the Jew billionaire, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, the Russian people were reduced to squalor.

In removing the twin evils of capitalist exploitation and communist manipulation, Adolf Hitler allowed the German economy to blossom, while the outside world still wallowed in Depression. The economic miracle he achieved was the chief cause of World War Two. It was set in motion the moment he based the value of money on the productivity of the German worker. Germany was suddenly freed from the international bankers who controlled every other industrial nation, and threatened to destroy their network of worldwide profit through example: As other, non-German peoples began to follow Hitler’s lead, the wealthy wire-pullers were in jeopardy of becoming extinct.

To save themselves, their newspaper and film industries churned out propaganda to inflame worldwide public opinion against Hitler, while their hired politicians, like Churchill and Roosevelt, schemed for a war that would annihilate competition from the Third Reich. Capitalists have always used their public mouth-pieces and political puppets to stir up artificial patriotism among the uncritical masses of Gentiles, who must pay in money and blood for foreign wars of economic aggression, such as the U.S. invasion of Iraq to steal that countryÕs rich oil supplies.

National Socialists are less interested in controlling economic life than in liberating all the inherent creative energies of our people, giving them free reign to manage their own business affairs and seek out the high potential of their natural productivity.

Don’t you believe in religious freedom?

In our ranks, devout Christians march side by side with critical atheists, or nature-worshiping pagans with indifferent agnostics. All of them, united in their determination to create a racially united society, respect each other’s fundamental right to seek God, or not to seek him, according to one’s own personal beliefs. We value spiritual freedom as the antidote to religious strife that has claimed millions of lives in stupid wars. National Socialists follow America’s Founding Fathers in their mutually respectful separation of Church and State, and according to the words of Jesus himself, who urged his followers to "pay homage to Caesar the things that are Caesars, and to God the things that are God’s."

Why do you hate the Jews?

For the last several thousand years, in every land on Earth, up to the present moment, Jews survive by stealing the wealth of productive peoples. At the same time, the Jews understand that they consistently run the risk of being unmasked as the parasites they are, so long as their host population still has enough racial instinct to recognize its own exploitation. Hence, the Jewish promotion of miscegenation at every level of White society, because a mixed people is no longer capable of understanding what is happening to it.

The more racially polluted a victimized people becomes, the less it is able to produce, and the greater its social disarray, until civilization utterly collapses in chaos. History is littered with dozens of examples, from ancient Egypt and Rome to modern times. America and the West have already entered into this historical cycle of decline, but may break free only if enough White-Aryans wake up to the Jews before conditions become irreversible.

What about the six million Jews murdered by Hitler?

Ask the average Gentile American how many Jews died in World War Two, and he will readily respond, "six million". Ask him how many Americans or Christians fell in that conflict, and he will not be able to answer. Nor is he sure how many Americans were killed during the Vietnam War, much less the Civil War or War for Independence. Yet, he is quite sure that "six million innocent Jews were murdered by the Nazis".

When brought to his attention, this disparity of awareness often makes him wonder why he should know with such alacrity about the questionable fate of a three per cent minority population, while far less about the very real sufferings of his own people.

The answer, of course, lies in the "Dead Six million" as a propaganda myth invented even before the Second World War, and since used to psychologically condition Aryans against "anti-Semitism" in general and National Socialism in particular. Interestingly, Gentiles who finally realize Jewry’s unsurpassed criminality are often disappointed to discover that the alleged "Holocaust" never took place.

What’s your "Final Solution" of the Jewish Question, then?

As used to be said of the Devil, "the power of Satan is that people do not believe in him." The same is true of the Jew. His power lies primarily in the failure of White Americans to recognize him. They have been skillfully and incessantly propagandized by every level of public information into accepting the Jews only as a "Chosen People" of the bible, persecuted for their pious religion. But the role of professional victim is the disguise behind which the Jew sucks the life-blood --- economically and racially --- of our people. Unmasking his real role in the poisoning of White Civilization is the most effective means of deflating his power. The evil he perpetuates against us must whither away in the harsh light of exposure.

How can you solve the race problem?

We advocate the removal of all non-Aryans from White Civilization by every means necessary. National Socialists do not believe in domestic segregation, but total geographical separation. It stands to reason that racial prejudice, bigotry and violence can only exist in multi-racial societies. There can be no racial injustice in an all-White nation. In the future, only members of our race may be citizens of our country. All others must be excluded.

Sending the negroes back to their African homeland is a traditional alternative. Repatriated blacks resulted in the West African state of Liberia during the 19th Century, and more than nine million them petitioned Congress for the funds necessary to return to the Dark Continent in the early 20th Century. If many millions of White Americans could have been sent overseas to slaughter their European brothers on behalf of International Jewry in World War Two, then the repatriation of as many blacks under peacetime conditions is no less feasible. If American technology can put White men into outer space, it can certainly return negroes to Africa.

But the blacks are only part of the Western World’s acute racial dilemma. Every Aryan nation must be racially disinfected until our civilization is entirely restored to its White inhabitants. The first and most important step in that direction is to arouse the will of our people on behalf of their own self-preservation as an Aryan race.

The War in Iraq: Israel Expects

The only issues in the Middle East are Jews and oil. All talk of "liberating" (i.e., conquering) the Iraqi people, or "fighting for freedom" are propaganda ploys designed to emotionally engineer masses of unthinking goyim into supporting aggression for ulterior motives. It is an old trick, going back to wars in Vietnam, Korea and Europe. Patriotic instincts can be artificially inflamed and misguided by political power-freaks intent on achieving secret agendas. U.S. intervention in Iraq is no different, and came about chiefly because Ariel Sharon demanded it. He often stated that none of his Arab neighbors would be allowed to approach military parity with Israel, which, alone in the Middle East, has owned a nuclear arsenal for at least fifteen years. George Bush’s public farce about phantom "weapons of mass-destruction" defines the identity of his Zionist puppet-master, because such arms are easily found in Israel, not Iraq. From the moment Saddam Hussein’s otherwise less than third-rate military developed a medium-range missile capable of striking Israel, the invasion of Iraq was inevitable. Americans are, therefore, fighting and dying for a cause that has nothing whatsoever to do with "homeland security", much less "liberating" the long-abused Iraqi people.

For years, going back to Daddy Bush’s administration, America committed genocide against the Iraqis --- especially against their children and elderly --- through prolonged sanctions that had negligible effect on Saddam Hussein’s armed forces, but catastrophically impacted his country’s hospital services. A United Nations’ study in spring, 2001, estimated that at least 200,000 people in Iraq had died directly of causes stemming from America’s embargo on vital medical supplies. Saddam may have been a brutal tyrant, but he was neither better nor worse than any other Arab leader. His only "crime" was to possess a missile that could reach --- never the United States --- but Israel. And that is the chief cause that singled him out for American involvement.

To be sure, there is also an obvious economic reason behind the U.S. invasion. Iraq is rich in petroleum, and geologists have been warning for some time that accessible oil supplies are rapidly dwindling. The key word here is "accessible". While the interior of our planet contains virtually limitless oil reserves, most lie at varying depths, where extracting the liquid gold is impossible at worst and extremely expensive at best. Relatively shallow, accessible deposits are running low. Seizing Iraqi oil will at least temporarily postpone the eventual collapse of an antiquated industrial complex still run on finite fossil fuels. As everyone knows, oil is equivalent with wealth, over which wars have been fought from the siege of Troy. Then as now, the rich booty of war never goes to common soldiers who suffer and die for its acquisition, but to their manipulative leaders safe at home.

The past teaches another lesson appropriate to the American conquest of Iraq: No war in the history of the world has ever been won by a multi-racial army, regardless of its numerical advantage. Our country’s humiliation at the hands of Asian peasants in Vietnam is a recent example. Many others go back to Persia’s defeat by a handful of Greeks, 2,500 years ago. Typically, the performance of the U.S. armed forces, for all their supposedly overwhelming technological strength, has been poor. In the fighting for Feluga, American forces were stymied and held at bay for many long weeks, despite repeated USAF air strikes. Although backed by a state-of-the-art military machine outfitted with the latest weaponry, America’s racially mixed servicemen and women are dropping like flies to an religiously inspired, racially homogeneous opponent with no air power, no armor, no advanced communications, and no artillery --- in fact, no heavy weapons of any kind. All they possess are anti-personnel bombs and small arms, mostly ex-Russian rifles taken from another military fiasco, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Yet, more than a year after President Bush’s premature victory celebration, more U.S. soldiers are being taken down in Iraq than ever. The effect of their sacrifice has been to make Americans the most hated people in the world. Morale both at home and overseas is declining. Suicide rates among enlisted personnel are at record highs, as state-side hospitals cannot keep up with increasing numbers of U.S. soldiers crippled, blinded and wounded --- for what? Jews and oil.

Meanwhile, the American "liberation" of Iraq has begun to resemble the German occupation of France, at least as it was over-dramatized by Hollywood propaganda films. In truth, the French were far more sympathetic to the Germans than the Iraqis will ever be to Americans. Thousands of Frenchmen volunteered to fight for the Third Reich in the SS Charlemagne Division, and performed with exemplary heroism in the defense of Berlin against the Soviet invaders. In sharp contrast, a detachment of Iraqis trained and equipped by the Americans refused to fight against their fellow countrymen at the first opportunity. Bush sycophants prate much about bringing democracy to Iraq, but only U.S. approved politicians are allowed to hold office or even run in elections there. None of this arrogant hypocrisy is lost on the Iraqi people. At least they are not alone, however.

A large and growing majority of Europeans oppose foreign involvement in Iraq. Yet, most of the allegedly "democratic" leaders, flagrantly against the popular will of their own people, have committed themselves to Iraqi involvement. England’s Tony Blair is widely known among the British people as "Bush’s poodle", a real-life caricature that could be just as accurately applied to any of the reigning puppets installed in Europe since World War Two. A self-evident financial indebtedness to the U.S. explains their unswerving commitment to Middle East meddling, despite majority opposition at home. For example, what possible interest could the Polish people have in Iraq, save for a few scraps from the Americans’ victory table picked up by their politicians? Happily, this widening rift between the masses of Europeans and their allegedly elected officials has effectively exposed the criminal farce of "democracy" more clearly than ever before, and is nurturing a general disenchantment with the entire postwar political system, with an attendant resurgence of popular "anti-Semitism".

But what is the future of the Iraq War? As one returning American soldier told The Chicago Tribune on condition of anonymity, "We’re not going to win this one!" He cited the virtually universal hatred Iraqis have for Americans. "And why not?," he asked. "Nobody likes to be militarily occupied. The same people who are friendly during the day are shooting at us after nightfall. We’d do the same if the U.S. were invaded.

With every hour of American "liberation" that passes, anger against America deepens and spreads throughout the Arab world and beyond. Our country is universally regarded as nothing more than the Arsenal of Jewry, whose president is an evangelical religious fanatic convinced that Ariel Sharon and his ilk are God’s "Chosen People". In occupying Iraq, Bush has set the stage for a much larger confrontation with Islam. The last such conflict took place a thousand years ago, when Pope Urban II contrived a crusade against the Moslem Near East to distract Europeans from their burgeoning dissatisfaction with his corrupt papacy. In the end, the crusaders were vanquished to the point of annihilation by the combined forces of Saladin. Today’s so-called "Islamic militants" are keenly aware of Saladin’s bloody triumph, and refer to the goy soldiers occupying their country as "crusaders".

Doubtless, the Americans and their reluctant allies will continue to enforce an increasingly noxious presence in Iraq. But the price will be steep, not only in the growing numbers of American soldiers killed and wounded. The effect of U.S. "liberation" has been to recruit new legions of terrorists. Their lethal hatred of 21st Century "crusaders" and those who support them is our legacy of a U.S. foreign policy utterly subservient to a foreign power that has dragged us into an abyss from which there is no evident escape. Because Israel demanded that one of her Arab neighbors be reduced, people on both sides in Iraq have been killed and maimed, with more to come. Fearful consequences unloosed throughout the world. In a profanation of Christ’s Last Supper George Bush claims to venerate, a blasphemous transubstantiation is taking place: Innocent blood is being exchanged for oil. Americans delude themselves, however, if they imagine that their dilemma can be solved simply by voting someone else into the White House. In doing so, they will only exchange one Jewized agent of corporate finance for another.

With an irony more ominous than assuring, civilization began between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, in what long after came to be known as Iraq. It is here, in this cradle of civilization, that a Zionist American president has fought against the fundamental survival of civilization itself. Time has come round from human creativity to self-destruction in the same region. It is a long cycle, from which mankind may either learn in time and take the proper action by freeing itself from an endless repetition of wars to make the world safe for Jewry. Or utterly perish.

What would life be like in an all-White America?

A relative paradise! Black and Hispanic areas overflowing with violent crime and putrid squalor would vanish. Americans would actually be able to walk without fear anywhere for the first time in more than fifty years. Murders, rapes and armed robberies would fall off to almost nothing. The urban garbage dumps into which our cities and towns have been transformed by hordes of black and brown sub-humans would be replaced by clean, safe neighborhoods. Gone the gangs, the pimps, the dope peddlers, the muggers. Gone the vandals, the diseased street walkers, the rappers, the hold-up men. Ridding ourselves of all non-Whites is synonymous with removing fear and filth from American society. White people would cease being victims in their own country.

Education, today dragged down by dim-witted racial inferiors, would unchain the learning potential of our students, who would cease being terrorized at integrated schools. Their psychological conditioning to adopt the repellent "cultures" of Africa or Latin America --- to regard themselves as no better than the lowest Hottentot --- would come to a screeching halt.

Epidemics such as AIDS, which was introduced from Africa during our nation’s bicentennial, would be extirpated. If only because of their characteristic lack of personal hygiene, non-Whites are infected with innumerable diseases. Hence, our people invariably run the risk of contamination through contact with racial undesirables.

Since narcotics are endemic to non-White societies, particularly Latino, drug addiction would no longer steal the minds and souls of Americans.

With work only for White men and women, unemployment would evaporate, and jobs stop draining overseas.

The obscene, deeply perverted and psychotic immorality of non-White "artists" would no longer be promoted as a way of life for our youth.

Best of all, race mixing would come to a DEAD halt, thereby rescuing our people from racial contamination and extinction.

Hitler lost World War Two, so what makes you think you can succeed where he failed?

Adolf Hitler’s chief military goal was saving Western Civilization from a Soviet take-over. In this, he succeeded, although at the cost of his country and his own life. He inflicted so many reverses on Communist forces, they were not strong enough to fulfill Stalin’s dream of over-running Western Europe. As George Lincoln Rockwell often said, "Adolf Hitler fought the Alamo of the White Race."

When a man gives his life for something he believes in, his idea outlives him, inspiring successive generations of new followers determined to make his worldview victorious. The Fuehrer’s sacrifice was no less a "defeat" than Christ’s crucifixion. Christians were hated and vilified for nearly four hundred years after the death of their leader, yet they eventually triumphed. Since 1945, National Socialists have become the most falsely hated and vilified persons on the planet. Despite decades of unprecedented lies and suppression, White men and women of all ages around the world are still drawn to Adolf Hitler’s "philosophy of life". Although born years after his passing, mostly in lands outside Germany, they are willing to work and sacrifice for the National Socialist idea against majority opinion, often risking violence, imprisonment and death. This is the kind of time-tested resilience that always makes for a successful revolution, regardless of the odds against it.

Beginning in 1776, a third of the American people opposed George Washington in the name of the British Crown. Nearly half were apathetic or hostile to Congress, the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. Barely one-fifth of the American people approved of the Revolution, and even this minority confined itself mostly to moral support. Far fewer individuals helped the Continental soldiers with food, clothing or shelter, while the actual number of men engaged in the fighting was miniscule. Despised and ignored by most of their fellow countrymen, the badly outnumbered patriots were fanatically inspired by an idea (liberty), with which they defeated the mightiest empire on Earth. We racial patriots see ourselves reflected in that precious historical example, and confidently wield our National Socialist idea against today’s mighty empire, which is no longer British, but Jewish.

Who was Commander Rockwell?

Born March 9, 1918, in Bloomington, Illinois, George Lincoln Rockwell grew up in New England, where he attended art college, eventually winning first prize in a national poster contest for the American Cancer Society. Alarmed by government, film industry, radio network and newspaper insistence that Hitler was planning to "conquer the world", he quit school at Rhode Island’s Brown University to join the U.S. Navy a year before Pearl Harbor. As a ship-board pilot, he participated in the destruction of several German submarines, and later went on to serve in the Korean War. Rockwell was honorably discharged from the Navy as a decorated veteran with the rank of Commander.

Following his distinguished military service, he resumed his art career as a graphic designer, married a local girl, and raised a family. His otherwise average life was disturbed by unavoidable comparisons between prewar promises and postwar realities. He had fought to free countries like Poland, Czechoslovakia, and China. Yet, these and many more lands fell under the shadow of Communist tyranny without a peep of protest from the same sources that had stridently urged him to take up arms against Hitler. Moreover, American society itself was in obvious decline --- culturally and racially. During the midst of his growing concerns, Rockwell stumbled upon a copy of "Mein Kampf", and was shocked to read of glaring parallels between conditions in Germany after the First World War and America’s decay following World War Two. Years of deep study and reflection convinced him National Socialism was the only antidote, so he founded the American Nazi Party, in fall, 1958.

Together with a small band of followers, he endured a long period of relentless legal and physical abuse at the hands of his enemies in the courts and in the streets, but became internationally known as the most dynamic opponent to negro agitation and Jewry in all its forms. By the last year of his life, however, he was beginning to show widespread appeal with White workers, youth and home-owners. After demonstrating that grass-roots support through several large rallies and marches in Chicago and Louisville, Rockwell was assassinated near his national headquarters, in Arlington, Virginia. The Commander’s mass-action and popular success had undoubtedly brought about his murder by the powers-that-be, who were afraid his new-found political attraction would eventually lead to their downfall. But his numerous recorded speeches and two published books --- "This Time The World" and "White Power" --- continue to inspire and guide successive generations of followers.

Commander Rockwell was a brave, eloquent leader who clearly articulated and personally epitomized National Socialism for modern audiences. He will be forever remembered as the tall hero who single-handedly lifted our Swastika from the ashes of war-torn Europe into the skies over America.

Are National Socialists "pro-life" or "free choice"?

Neither. Life begins at conception, and a woman who extinguishes that life in her womb commits infanticide, unless mitigating circumstances are involved. Abortion is necessary if a mother’s life or health are endangered by her pregnancy; if her pregnancy is the result of rape; if indications are clear that the fetus suffers from acute, irreversible genetic, brain or physical disorders; and especially if the mother has been impregnated by a non-Aryan father.

A woman who otherwise seeks to abort her unborn baby simply because its existence is inconvenient or undesirable is a child-murderer. Anyone who assists such a criminal is an accomplice equally deserving of the most severe prosecution and punishment. In the coming National Socialist state, healthy infants unwanted by their parents will be made available to qualified persons who want children.

We believe that the combined non-White populations of the entire planet are not worth the life of a single, healthy Aryan child.

But don’t Nazis look down on women as inferior to men?

The Third Reich’s greatest cinematographer was Leni Riefenstahl, whose "Triumph of the Will" and "Olympia" are still regarded, even by our enemies, as among the finest films ever produced. History’s first helicopter and ram-jet aircraft were flown by the Luftwaffe’s most famous test pilot, Hanna Reitsch. Concert pianist and Bach "specialist", Li Stadelmann, was not only the world’s most acclaimed harpsichord player, but an outspoken NSDAP member. Referring to the domination and perversion of Aryan music previous to the Party’s 1933 assumption of power, she declared, "Now our German masters will find German interpreters!" Paintings by female artists were well represented at the opening of Munich’s House of German Art, in 1937. Examples of women who found the freedom to excel through National Socialism are numerous.

Far from being down-trodden, Hitler’s Revolution liberated women from eighteen years of depravation and unhappiness resulting from World War One and its aftermath. During that dark period of Marxist-democratic decay, prevailing economic misery and popularized immorality reduced women to a pitiful condition. Prostitution and pornography were big business; drug abuse was rampant; motherhood and feminine virtue wee ridiculed by the entertainment media; family life disintegrated; individual alienation, emotional depression and suicide reached epidemic proportions.

This social terminal moraine into which German women found themselves was transformed over night when Adolf Hitler seized the drifting helm of state in 1933. Restoring the economy’s health by making it the sole responsibility of the German worker, and by driving out the Jewish money-changers with their corporate immorality, he abolished the fundamental causes of female victimization. No less importantly, his National Socialist idea inspired women by appealing to their deeper instincts of family loyalty and racial community. Women who gave birth to healthy babies were now honored with a beautiful Mother’s Cross, and provided with generous state aid in the rearing of their children. Many family services were free to German mothers, and female education stressed, but was not limited to, health, home economics, sport, agriculture and the arts. With generous grants of assistance and public emphasis on the family as the hub of society, women prospered in a renewal of happy domestic life unknown to generations before or since.

Far from being restricted in Hitler’s Germany, women were liberated and up-lifted from the humiliation and misery of former democratic times, which resemble ours because the Jews were no less responsible for conditions then as now. Modern woman’s perceived economic independence has been purchased at a steep price. Her stress-related illnesses and suicide rate have reached record heights. Her home life is in tatters. And more White women are raped and beaten, mostly by black and Latino men, than ever before. In the all-Aryan world we will build, such violence will cease, and she will regain her supremely important position as the fountain-head of mankind’s superior race. As such, she is the embodiment of everything we believe in and fight for.

Comparing the respective "benefits" of liberal democracy with the Third Reich, it is not surprising then, that many millions of European women were fanatical followers of Adolf Hitler from the earliest days of his Movement until war’s end and beyond. If 21st Century National Socialists can achieve half of what he did for Aryan womanhood, we will have much cause to celebrate.

The Fallacy of "the Human Race"

Proponents of democracy insist only one race --- the human race --- exists. Perceived variations between all anthropomorphic creatures able to walk more of less upright on two, hind legs are insignificant. Any alleged "differences" between a blue-eyed Scandinavian blond and a blue-black pygmy may be dismissed as entirely the accidental result of culture and environment. Exchanging locations and traditional societies must result in the Scandinavian eventually becoming a pygmy and the pygmy becoming a Scandinavian. If anything, inter-bred hybrids are stronger, healthier and smarter than specimens of supposedly "pure" peoples. Racism is mankind’s (read, White mankind’s) Original Sin beyond the pale of forgiveness, although the same faux pas is permissible, even laudable "self-pride" when expressed by non-Aryans. As one of innumerable examples, "For Blacks Only" was a popular television show during the last century, when a comparable program entitled "For Whites Only" would have been abhorred as "racist". Most importantly, there can be no universal peace or harmony until all so-called "races" are blended into a single, one-world humanity.

Such views are not simply an opinion deemed generally pathological until only the last two decades. They are being embraced by millions of intellectually lazy fools as tenets of a religion with all the fanatic demands and zero tolerance common to close-minded dogmas everywhere. As willing stimulus-response victims, their followers have gladly surrendered themselves to the less demanding artificiality of political correctness. Human lab rats of Pavlovian mass-manipulation such as these have always found conformity easier and safer than thinking for themselves. Their color-blind democracy is the 21st Century equivalent of Medievalism, whose pious advocates burned thousands of dissenters at the stake, along with heretical books, during a period remembered as the Dark Ages.

Today’s equalitarian zealots boast of their ideological descent from America’s Founding Fathers. Yet, the word "democracy" does not appear once in the Bill of Rights, the U.S. Constitution, nor the constitution of any state in the United States. It is, however, found among the recorded speeches and written statements of Washington, Jefferson, Adams and all early American leaders. They were unanimous in their condemnation of democracy as "mob rule", a political stage-prop long used by corrupt demagogues to win over uncritical persons with flambouyant, but unfounded promises.

In the real world, democracy is an Madison Avenue illusion blinding generations of working Gentiles who have been convinced that their individual votes are somehow synonymous with the will of an infallible majority. These thoughtless voting cattle, laughed at by the Jews as goyim, are herded by the tried-and-true techniques of political advertising into selecting either this democratic Tweedle-Dee-Dee, or that republican Tweedle-Dee-Dum. Both of them are only different agents for the same Plutocracy, or rule by wealth, that actually runs the U.S. And since that huge economic power is entirely at the disposal of Zionist agendas, it is more accurately described as a Jewocracy, the real power that has dominated America and Western Civilization since the death of Adolf Hitler.

Our Colonial forefathers --- most of whom owned black slaves --- gave us, not a race-mixed democracy, but a constitutional republic. The mere fact that most Americans can no longer distinguish between the two demonstrates just how utterly cut off they are from their own heritage. Under an alleged "democracy", one is automatically born a citizen. There are no requirements outside one’s fortuitous birth on U.S. soil, and you don’t even have to speak the same, national language anymore. This means that the vote of a virtually illiterate Hispanic has the same value as that of a White college professor. And since there are very many more witless Latinos, indifferent to everything save their own ethnicity, than White college professors, the latter are invariably out-voted by the former. This real-life numerical supremacy over intellectual superiority is rooted in democracy’s rigid denial of any racial differences. Consequently, Aryan Americans are witnessing their steady disenfranchisement at every level of society. Liberals ashamed of their white skin refuse to recognize this obvious injustice resulting from a misplaced zeal for "fairness" through enforced equality at all costs.

A birth certificate is not the sole requirement for citizenship in a constitutional republic, however. Citizenship is not some right handed out just because someone --- anyone --- had the good fortune to be born in North America. It is a privilege to be earned only by men and women belonging to the same racially related people who envisioned our country. They were not black, or Hispanic, Asian, Jewish, Arabic, or whatever, but White. None of these other peoples ever thought of or expressed sympathy for anything remotely similar to a constitutional republic. It is exclusively the product of the Aryan mind. Left to themselves, non-Whites traditionally form absolute monarchies dominated by bloody tyrants, who, of necessity, impose cruelty on their own people as the best means of keeping the savage masses somewhat in line.

As the National Socialist contribution to America’s constitutional republic, it will be emphatically stressed in no uncertain terms that members of our race may alone be members of our state. Citizenship will be available to Whites only after their eighteenth birthday, when they will be given the opportunity to prove they understand the fundamental principles of their government, and are gainfully employed or in the process of education. Only then may they be allowed to participate in the election of our leaders. These restrictions are based on the rational observation that good statesmanship is not possible without an informed electorate. Today’s racial mish-mash of self-centered voting blocks are far from that. They are instead emotionally engineered bean bags the Jews enjoy tossing back and forth between the appropriately symbolized democratic jack ass and the GOP’s financially obese elephant with its grasping, capitalist trunk. It is no wonder, then, that from this pathetic electoral circus, in which White voters are steadily marginalized, emerge mean-spirited mediocrities with Dark Age mentalities like Bush, or uninspiring, upwardly mobile glad-handers like Kerry. They are all alike front-men for the Jewocracy that awarded them their prestigious, if hollow crown. Given the Jews unbridled power, how could it be otherwise?

Criminal clowns such as their political shills will never again embarrass and betray our race and nation, once the coming National Socialist state has unfurled its Swastika banner over the White House. Only then will qualified White Americans be able to freely choose their own leaders, as they once did when electing George Washington or Andrew Jackson. The appalling contrast real men such as these make compared to the moral midgets and Jew stooges who replaced them at the oval office clearly shows just how shamefully far our government has fallen since it was conceived more than two centuries ago. Liberals who shrug their shoulders, "Well, that was then; this is now," only reveal a total ignorance of the past and inflexible resistance to learn from it when historical parallels threaten to debunk their democratic superstitions. "Racial differences are neither nice nor fair; therefore, we will ignore them as though they don’t exist," is the liberal mind-set.

Democracy is today’s version of "The Emperor’s New Clothes", in which no one is supposed to notice the naked lie of racial equality. Dressed in the patriotic garb of Uncle Sam, smiling tyrants conceal their hidden agendas of power and money.

Wasn’t Hitler a failed amateur painter who imposed his bad taste on German art?

The hundreds of oils, water colors and illustrations reproduced in "Adolf Hitler, The Unknown Artist" (Billy F. Price Publishing Co., Houston, TX, 1984) mostly portray cathedrals, landscapes, flowers, street scenes and portraits that most viewers agree only an exceptional talent could have created. These works make it quite clear that had he chosen a different path in life, the world would have remembered Adolf Hitler as one of the outstanding artists of the early 20th Century.

In the aftermath of World War One, masses of Jews from around the world descended on a defeated Germany to take advantage of its economic misery. "Buy cheap, sell high" was the same watchword they went by seventy years later, when the likes of Mikhail Khodorkovsky and other kosher oligarches victimized the disenfranchised Russian people after the collapse of Soviet communism. It was the Jews who degraded art into a mere business, transforming it from creativity into cash. Worse, their anti-White instinct vented itself in hatred for all things Aryan through the art world they now completely dominated. Beloved works of the old masters were ridiculed as quaintly out of date, while the psychotic dabbling of Picasso and his fellow Jews were promoted as the greatest paintings of all time.

After Hitler threw them out, they simply moved on to the United States, where these artistic carpet-baggers debased art in America, just as they had in Europe. He not only liberated German artists from Jewish domination, but inspired them with the new concept of racial destiny. They were now given a mission to express that spirit, to visualize it for their fellow countrymen. The result was a unique, dynamic and vibrant body of art still avidly sought after by collectors around the world.

So too, the repellent lunacy held up as "art" in today’s world will be replaced by the true masterpieces of race-conscious, Aryan creators able to materialize the soul of our people in stone, paint, words and music.

"Popular Entertainment"

What passes today as "popular entertainment" is largely anti-White propaganda driven to emotionally engineer whole generations against every aspect of Aryan culture. This is because the film, television, and music industries were long ago captured by and are still dominated by the Jew, who uses them to undermine and ultimately destroy our race. With greater frequency and less subtlety, he never misses an opportunity to insinuate or openly promote race-mixing, or to defame and degrade our people. In his movies and t.v. shows packaged for mass consumption, the only White "heroes" are those who gush fulsome love for non-Aryans. More than a century of such deliberate poisoning have eradicated any trace of racial self-respect from millions of our people, who are convinced that embracing the lowest dregs of Africa is not only fashionable, but meritorious. Their racially suicidal transformation would never have been possible without the decades of pervasive brain-washing that scoured away our natural aversion to the Mud peoples of this world.

In the coming all-White society built by National Socialism, popular entertainment will be thoroughly purged of its ruinous Jewish agendas, and restored to its Aryan artists and performers. No longer will our people be led to their self-destruction by the kosher pied-pipers of Hollywood or MTV, but enjoy instead the images and echoes of their true identity as the world’s greatest race.

You talk about the Jews as though they were a "race" of some kind, but aren’t they just Americans who happen to believe in a religion of their own?

Among the Jews themselves, their greatest concern, as repeatedly stated in their newspapers, is what they refer to as "the danger of assimilation" from the same inter-racial melting-pot they have brewed for the rest of us. While they are above criticism or reproach in all things, any Gentiles who might engage in the same kind of discussion about "assimilation" would elicit gasps of "racist!" from shocked and mortally offended liberals.

If a race may be generally defined as a group of genetically related human beings who share a common set of inherited mental and physical characteristics that distinguish them from other groups, then the Jews are a unquestionably a race. For example, Tay-Sachs is an inherited disease found only in the blood of Jews or persons with at least some Jewish ancestry. It does not occur among Gentiles.

The facial appearances individual members of a particular race are born with, like those of the Federal Reserve chairman, Alan Greenspan, or "entertainers" like Seinfeld, clearly identify such individuals as Jews. These superficial differences are neither good nor bad in themselves, but only help distinguish one race from another. The Jews cannot be faulted just because they might be a different people, however. And even as crazy as their Judaism appears to the outside world, they should be allowed to freely practice their beliefs without interference from anyone.

Our objection to the Jews has nothing to do with their loony religion, nor even their identification as a race unto themselves. But solely upon their persistent, so far successful attempt to dominate and destroy White civilization. In this, they are racially motivated, and we have not only a fundamental right, but the highest duty to defend our people against them. For more than two thousand years, the Jews have wrapped their felonious behavior in the disguise of "religious persecution", an effective ploy to cast their own victims, who dare react against Jewish control, as "bigots". But it is a ploy which must not deter honest men whose racial existence is at stake.

Criminals are found among every people, so what makes the Jews worse than anyone else?

No other race comes close to the horrific impact made on our world by this tiny minority of mankind. A catalog of its crimes requires volumes to describe.

Most recently, the death, agony and destruction in Iraq came about through Ariel Sharon’s insistence that U.S. forces neutralize Saddam Hussein’s ability to strike Israel. For obvious reasons, the Jews were determined to destroy Hitler and punish the Germans for supporting him, even if it meant the loss of tens of millions of Gentiles in World War Two. Just twenty years earlier, Zionists dragged Americans against their will into World War One by way of the Balfour Decision that broke England’s promise to her own Arab allies by stealing their Palestinian homeland, which was turned over to the Jews, with dreadful consequences ever since.

As Gentile men were killing each other on French battlefields to implement Zionist agendas of which they knew nothing, the overwhelmingly Jewish Communist revolution transformed Christian Russia into a Soviet gulag that starved, tortured and murdered countless victims for more than seventy years. Meanwhile, the streets of American cities ran with the blood of men and women murdered by predominantly Jewish organized crime, from "Dutch" Schultz to New York’s "Purple Gang".

International Jewish bankers tore up the U.S. Constitution back in 1913, when the Warburg’s Federal Reserve System stole from Congress its right to issue and control our money. In the century before, they engineered the American Civil War when the House of Rothschild in Europe installed its agent, Judah P. Benjamin, as the Confederacy’s Secretary of State.

Throughout recorded history, as far back as the Ancient World, the Jews have acted with a criminal consistency that defies coincidence, subverting Gentile civilizations, stealing their wealth, and murdering millions. Even mainstream historians now acknowledge that Rome was not burned by Emperor Nero, but Jewish zealots pretending to be Christians. Earlier still, when Cleopatra was Queen of Egypt, she became fluent in Hebrew, all the better to communicate with (and flatter) her wealthy Jewish creditors, who held her throne in pawn, and forced her to turn over tax-farming to their relatives. All tax-collectors in her realm were Jews empowered to arrest and torture tax delinquents, and protected by their own bodyguards from the Egyptians they gouged and impoverished. The Jews themselves celebrate the overthrow of ancient Persia in an annual "Purim Festival", during which they inculcate their own children with immemorial hatred by encouraging them to hysterically run about with "Hammon dolls" (representations of the despised Gentiles), smashing the toy heads and trampling them under foot.

The unparalleled scope of these monumental offenses, spanning not centuries but millennia, hardly comprise a thumb-nail sketch of the Jews" crimes against humanity.

But why should the Jews want to control and eventually destroy civilization?

Dr. Joseph Goebbels likened them to a swarm of potato bugs, which buzz from one field to another. The insects cannot help themselves from devouring every crop into which they drift. "The Jews similarly destroy the nations and peoples of the world," the good doctor observed.

His analogy suggests that Jews are instinctually driven to corrupt and ruin civilization wherever they find it. Trying to turn them into good Christians, as suggested by Shakespeare in The Merchant of Venice, only provides them with another cover under which they conceal their uninterrupted villainy. As born parasites, no amount of re-programming can turn potato-bugs into wonderful butterflies. Even severe legal prosecution against individually powerful Jews, such as that inflicted recently on Martha Stewart’s kosher corrupter, or the exploitative oil oligarch, Mikhail Khodorkovski, imprisoned in Russia, amounts to a relatively harmless insecticide. Instead, the Western world needs to be crop-dusted with something far more inclusive. One nationally televised documentary exposing Jewish perfidy will be a thousand times more effective than all baptismal fonts and court convictions combined.

How the Jews became what they are is perhaps revealed in their ancient origins. They are probably descended from Semitic inhabitants in Palestine, perhaps the Canaanites mentioned by the Old Testament. Every people produces a minority criminal class, and the Canaanites expelled theirs into the desert, where harsh conditions weeded out all but the strongest, shrewdest individuals. From this exiled group of dangerous misfits who formed their own gene pool of survival traits, the Jewish race might have eventually emerged from petty bandits to the transnational corporate bandits of today. They have been a non-nation of exiles ever since. A similar criminal people could be created today if, for example, America’s prison populations of hereditary felons inter-breed exclusively among themselves, thereby combining and passing on their twisted heritage to following generations of malefactors in a new genetic group.

Demanding desert conditions of four thousand or more years ago would have similarly forced the Canaanite exiles to combine and adapt, or die. Many, maybe most, did. But enough --- the strongest and most resourceful --- survived to pass their toughened genetic inheritance down across successive generations, resulting in a race apart. Today’s Jews are perhaps the descendants of this ancient class of exiled Semites, despite inevitable "assimilation" with Gentiles over the centuries, as they wandered from people to people, first ingratiating themselves as the innocent victims of "religious persecution", then making themselves indispensable through loan-lending, eventually poisoning all potential native opposition that stood in their way of obtaining power, finally devouring the host culture’s wealth before moving on to another people and repeating the process elsewhere. This would help explain their unfortunate reputation as human potato-bugs.

Complimenting these historical speculations, a metaphysical interpretation argues that the Jews are part of the very force that characterizes existence itself; namely, the eternal confrontation of opposites: light contrasted by darkness, heat versus cold, gravity and matter, life and death throughout the animal kingdom, etc., etc. It is through the process of struggle that life is either made stronger and earns its right to survive, or succumbs and vanishes. So too, the supreme creative race of our planet is opposed by its polar opposite. Only in overcoming the Jews can Aryan mankind fulfill its godlike destiny. To lose such a struggle must not only rob us of our yet unfulfilled potential, but condemn us to the same fate that befell all other defunct species before us: extinction.

In this, we are no different than the dinosaurs who failed to prevail over their own particular challenges. We differ from them only in that, should we fall, no one will be left in the future to wonder over our fossilized bones.

How can you claim any superiority for the Aryan Race, when colored persons from America and around the world outnumbered their White competitors and won many gold medals in the last Olympics?

The Olympics was conceived exclusively by Aryan men in ancient Greece. Blacks, beaners, sand-niggers, gooks or other assorted Mud People had nothing whatsoever to do with the Games in any way, shape or form. While it is entirely possible that the Jews could have been ticket-sellers even way back then, in places like Mexico, the Congo, Arabia or China, the only equivalent spectator sports were cannibalism, tribal warfare and courtly torture.

Given a more than two thousand-year history of the Olympics, the participation of non-Whites is a very recent affair, and then only for political reasons unrelated to sports. For the 1936 Olympics, anti-Hitler zealots in the U.S. deliberately fielded a negro, Jesse Owens, to embarrass the Germans. Nonetheless, the Third Reich came away with the most gold medals. Since then, the Olympics have been reduced by the haters of everything White from a purely Aryan festival celebrating the magnificence of our race to a propaganda spectacle promoting "multi-culturalism" --- newspeak for "race-mixing". Whenever non-Aryans are hyped today, whether in the Olympics or anywhere else, the intent is uniformly aimed at conditioning Whites, especially impressionable young people, into embracing colored competitors as superior heroes. This is part of today’s pervasive attempt at every level of society to breed us out of existence and make us feel weaker than more dynamic Afro-Americans or other ape-like primitives.

Despite the race-pollution agenda of anti-White propagandists, however, the Olympics naturally highlight some of the very racial differences we are supposed to ignore. For example, after trying to escape from hungry lions in Nigeria for so many generations, blacks typically excel in the sprint. (Although the famous British poet, Rudyard Kipling, once referred to negroes as "the most ungraceful beasts in the African jungle".) So too, Asians are good long-distance-runners: it’s always been a long way across China! In competitions requiring more brains and balance than brute strength, such as the javelin-throw or high-jump, Aryans usually lead the rest.

Far more importantly, racial standing cannot be determined by the relatively puny condition of the human body. Mohammed Ali in his prime could not have survived one round with an average gorilla, just as the fastest runner from the Peoples’ Republic would not stand a Chinaman’s chance against an ordinary cheetah. According to arguments for colored superiority based on physical strength, Africans, Vietnamese and all the rest are inferior to most other animals.

It is the champion Aryan brain that distinguishes us as the only civilizing people on Earth, and confirms White supremacy as a fact of life. Not only was the very notion of an Olympics the exclusive product of that mind, but so was the technology that transmitted its images around the world, the city and stadium in which it was held, even the clothes worn and language spoken (however garbled) by its Afro-American participants. Strip the Games of their Aryan details and competitors, and the only thing left would be a gaggle of naked savages running around in the jungle. On the other hand, an all-White Olympics would restore the Games to their original condition as a worldwide celebration of the unique Aryan spirit.

National Socialists criticize the U.S. invasion of Iraq, but don’t you support our troops?

We sincerely and deeply sympathize with the families of all service personnel killed or wounded in Iraq. Although even Kofie Annan, the black chairman of the United Nations, recognizes that the U.S. invasion is "illegal", a soldier cannot be held responsible for his orders, except to obey them. As Shakespeare says in King Henry V, "we know enough if we know we are the king’s subjects. If his cause be wrong, our obedience to the king wipes the crime of it out of us. But if the cause be not good, the king himself hath a heavy reckoning to make when all those legs and arms and heads chopped off in a battle shall join together at the latter day and cry, ‘We died at such a place!’, some crying for a surgeon; some upon their wives left poor behind them; some upon their children rawly left. Now, if these men do not die well, it will be a black matter for the king that led them to it." U.S. soldiers have been misled by King Bush II, and, as such, they are victims of Israel and the oil companies which demanded Iraq’s subjugation.

So long as our country is dominated by money and Jews, each generation is required to die in wars needed to fulfill the alien programs of high finance and Zionism. We believe that Americans should be asked to fight and risk their lives only when the freedom of their country is clearly at stake, not at the whim of over-fed Jews like Ariel Sharon, or mouthpieces like George Bush for transnational corporations.

How would you fight terrorism, then?

No politician and no one in the entire news media dares breathe a word about the real reason behind the destruction of New York’s World Trade Center or the war in Iraq; namely, the U.S. government’s unconditional support of Israel, which has antagonized the entire Islamic world. It has made us lethal enemies from many millions of Arabs, who will never forget or forgive the American-built bull-dozers which demolish refugee homes in Palestine, or the American-built helicopter gun-ships that blow up schools and hospitals, killing defenseless women and children. If our government would renounce its Zionist ties, cut off all further financial and military aid to Tel-Aviv, and publicly expose Jewish influence behind international affairs, the "war against terrorism" would be won without firing another shot. No "homeland security", increased troop strength in Iraq, or staged elections there of political puppets will prevent the birth of new generations of Arabs who hate us more than they love their own lives.

Americans must decide if their unreciprocal love affair with tiny Israel is worth a future of unremitting fear and escalating violence both at home and throughout the world.

What would you do about threats from North Korea?

President Bush, at the beckon call of his Zionist handlers, over-committed American military strength in the Iraqi sink-hole. We are thus too weak to deal with the far more dangerous challenge of the North Koreans, who are obviously talking advantage of our distraction in the Middle East by flexing their nuclear might. Bush further exacerbated the crisis by refusing any dialogue with the Reds, among the last die-hards of a defunct system being kept politically afloat only by creating a diversion from their failed ideology. They hope that the rattling of atomic sabers will distract the hungry masses of their own people from the Communist government’s appalling failure to feed them. Such saber-rattling is sure to get louder and more dangerous, with actual potential for a nuclear exchange, so long as America, preoccupied in Iraq, continues to ignore reality in the Far East.

An amicable solution is self-evident, but apparently beyond the scope of a president interested instead in stealing the oil reserves of other nations while fulfilling Zionist agendas. A better leader would understand that the North Koreans are in a terminal situation. Presenting them with abundant food supplies in exchange for nuclear disarmament would be an offer they could not refuse. Whether or not North Korea continues to be run by obsolete, aging Marxists is far less significant than their atomic weapons capability. Once their nuclear fangs have been pulled, the North Koreans can threaten no one, either militarily or ideologically, and the crisis will be defused. This is the kind of rational diplomacy a government indebted to the likes of Haliburton, Enron and Israel is unable to pursue, but typifies National Socialist decisiveness in the name of efficacy and reason.

Will National Socialists allow or out-law "gay marriage", so much in the news these days?

If America’s Founding Fathers ever imagined in their wildest dreams (nightmares) that homosexual marriage would be a future issue in the republic they created, they would have unanimously endorsed a constitutional amendment criminalizing such an outrage in the strongest possible language. Generally regarded as the most civilized president ever to have occupied the White House, Thomas Jefferson stated that convicted lesbians should lose their ears and noses, while faggots would not have been so "gay" in 18th Century America, where they were lucky to have escaped castration. That such behavior is now associated with "holy matrimony", the most sacred bond between two human beings, is a clear indication how socially unhinged the United States and Western Civilization have become. It is no wonder that our country is known as "the Great Satan" throughout the Islamic World.

America’s abrupt proliferation of perverts has resulted from too many generations of bad breeding; the lower, defective elements of our population have been allowed to reproduce themselves unchecked. "Gay marriage" is another poison fruit of democracy, whose self-righteous advocates have for so long repeated the lying mantra of human equality. The most monstrous examples of mental retardation, physical deformity or moral degeneracy have been nurtured with misguided sympathy, held up as equals or even superiors, and, worst of all, allowed to reproduce themselves and their serious imperfections on an exponentially burgeoning scale. These self-evident inferiors are fueling a population explosion that threatens to actually out-number sane, healthy Americans before the close of the 21st Century. It is an obvious law of nature that any race which does not breed its best stock upward inevitably succumbs to its lowest common denominators.

Many, perhaps most homosexuals and lesbians are recognizable because they inherited their insanity as genetically botched flukes. They are not culturally conditioned victims, but unnatural freaks that would have never been born in a society mindful of breeding only its best human stock.

Marriage is "holy matrimony", against which the leftist liberals and their perverted ilk have blasphemed in the most despicable fashion. And so it will be again, when National Socialists have elevated love between a man and woman to its highest place in the celebration, preservation and perfection of our Aryan Race. Anyone who seeks to again subvert its sacred vows will be ruthlessly driven back into the so-called "closets" of moral corruption from which they came, and the door bolted shut after them for all time.

Health care was hotly debated in the last election. What is the National Socialist take on this issue?

The deplorable condition of health care in the United States is infamous. Less well known is the Jewish stranglehold on America’s pharmaceutical industry, which is responsible for the extravagant cost of medication. Health care is unaffordable in large measure because mostly Jewish lawyers have forced doctors to pay ruinous premiums for ‘no-fault’ insurance. Between the kosher drug companies and attorneys, medical attention is rapidly becoming less and less accessible to everyone but the rich.

Clearly, radical solutions alone are capable of rectifying an otherwise hopeless situation. In the coming National Socialist future, every citizen will pay a nominal health care tax sufficient to provide lifetime, unlimited health coverage and even provide for medical research. The billions of dollars presently being wasted on federal programs aimed at making civilized human beings out of hopeless colored savages, lost in exorbitant adventures like the Iraq War, or thrown away on foreign aid to Israel, will be used in the service of Aryan Americans. The drug industries will be nationalized, and physicians handsomely salaried by a folkish state motivated solely by its determination to care for our racial well-being. After we have driven the money-changers from the temple of medicine, White people will never again be asked how much care they can afford.

Public health and medical research, particularly in cancer prevention and treatment, during the Third Reich were the finest on Earth, because Adolf Hitler set a standard of social concern we are determined to revive. Until then, health care in the United States is terminally ill, and will continue to force more and more Americans into misery and death. These are the logical consequences of a Jewized society where money dominates everything. Only in a National Socialist world, where racial health is paramount, may our people live and flourish.

American National Socialists favored neither the Republican nor Democratic candidates for president in the last election. Have there ever been any presidents you admired?

U.S. presidents from George Washington to Andrew Johnson mostly epitomized Aryan statesmanship, because our government was headed by race-conscious White men from its inception until the War Between the States. The only exception during that early period was John Adams, who tried to establish a tyranny through his Sedition Acts, late 18th Century versions of today’s insidious ‘Patriot’ Act. The post-Civil War era witnessed a large influx of mostly Eastern European Jews, who lost no time in exerting their financial influence on White House policies. Consequently, a string of utterly forgettable political hacks, like Rutherford B. Hays and Chester Arthur, occupied the oval office as willing pathfinders for the ambitious Jews. They found their first real agent in Woodrow Wilson. He obligingly railroaded America into World War One, as part of a deal with England to turn over Palestine to Zionist thieves.

Since then, only candidates willing to betray their race by acting as Gentile front-men for Jewish interests have been allowed to run for the presidency. No matter who the masses of American voters elected, their choice was already in the Jews’ pocket. Aware as we are of this political shell-game, the presidents who most represented our worldview naturally belong to an epoch early in American history, before the ascendency of the Jewocracy that has ruled our country since 1913. These men include Thomas Jefferson (who initiated negro repatriation to Africa), Andrew Jackson (an active racist, he defeated attempts by Jewish financiers to take over the United States), James K. Polk (he invaded and defeated Mexico), and Abraham Lincoln (who would have completed black repatriation, had he lived).

Even some of the Jew stooges chaffed under the kosher yoke into which they voluntarily slipped their necks to become president. In his second volume of the life of Winston Churchill, historian David Irving reports a private statement made during the Second World War, in Casablanca, Morocco, by Franklin D. Roosevelt to the effect that he could not blame the Germans for having turned to the Nazis. ‘Any other people would have done the same,’ he said, ‘had they been so mistreated by the Jews.’

When Richard Nixon realized he had been betrayed by Henry Kissinger, Herbert Stein and all the other Zionist ‘advisors’ with whom he too long surrounded himself, he lamented to the Rev. Billy Graham that Jewish power was even beyond the reach of presidential control. Only someone outside the system might be strong enough to someday save America from Jewish rapacity, Nixon suggested, and Graham agreed that, if ever such a man should arise, they should both support him.

Most remarkable of the recalcitrant chiefs-of-state was John Fitzgerald Kennedy, the last man to achieve the White House with Gentile money. His father, Joseph P. Kennedy, was one of the country’s wealthiest men. Something of J.F.K.’s racial instinct apparently broke through his playboy presidency seeing the Berlin wall, which he visited on his first trip to Germany. The ugly Communist barrier prompted him to make some conditional, but nonetheless exceptional comments about Adolf Hitler. He then moved on to see Berchtesgaden and the Fuehrer’s ‘Eagle’s Lair’ on the Obersalzberg.

After visiting these two places, he declared, ‘You can easily understand how that within a few years Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived. He had a mystery about him in the way that he lived and the manner of his death that will live and grow after him. He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.’ (‘Prelude to Leadership, The European Diaries of John F. Kennedy’, Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1965, p. 74.) According to the author, Gore Vidal, in his 1997 book, ‘Palimpsest’, Kennedy expressed his desire to free Rudolf Hess, then still imprisoned at Berlin’s Spandau fortress. These statements call into question possible motives behind J.F.K.’s assassination. The Jews would have never tolerated a presidential pardon for the former Vice Fuehrer of the Third Reich.

Aside from these rare exceptions, the White House has not been occupied by a race-conscious Aryan since the late 19th Century. Since then, every chief-of-state was and is nothing more than a Gentile shill acting for the Jewocracy that really rules America.

Where did the Aryans originate, and how did they become the Master Race of our planet?

One million years ago, our vegetarian ancestors descended from their arboreal existence onto the plains of South-Central Africa to pick at the remains of meals left by predators. In the process, these proto-humans became meat-eaters. To satisfy their acquired taste, they were forced to learn how to hunt. Developing the necessary skills stimulated their intellectual development, and gave them an upright posture as swift bipedal runners.

After approximately nine hundred thousand years of evolutionary progress, some fundamental environmental change drove game herds hunted by homo-erectus out of South-Central Africa. They were pursued by the more courageous, physically dynamic and intellectually capable of these early humans. Following retreating pasture lands into Northern Europe, the animals led hunting societies into formidable natural surroundings, in which homo-erectus must either adapt or die. Most did, but during the struggle for existence, over the course of millennia, a few survivors gained in strength and cunning. With the onset of Ice Ages, the interplay of heredity and environment produced a new race of large-brained creators superior in stamina and intellect to any other version of the human species.

About forty thousand years ago, another natural cataclysm forced them from the Baltic to the Steppes of Central Russia, the Caucasus, from which they derived their identity as ‘Caucasians’. For several more millennia, they honed their skills as successful cattle-barons, until population pressures forced them to migrate across the European Continent. There they responded to new environmental conditions to become the great cave artists of Lascaux and Trois Freres, and Western Civilization was born.

Meanwhile, descendants of homo-erectus who lacked the courage, strength and intelligence to follow animal herds into new, tough surroundings continued to slowly evolve under the less difficult challenges in South-Central Africa. They passed on their less-stimulated traits to their descendants, who evolved dark skin in response to excessive sunlight, and became the negro races of today.

Don’t you feel sorry for all those people killed in the recent Indian Ocean tsunami?

We regret the loss of Swedish, German, Aryan American or other racial family victims, but 160,000 dead doesn’t even put a dent in Asia’s huge non-White populations. While some evangelicals are convinced such a cataclysm is a merciful Yahweh’s method of converting the heathen to his old time religion, it seems more likely that Mother Earth, disgusted with too many sub-humans crawling on her back, tries to shrug off as many of them as she can in an occasional convulsion. Only hysterical simpletons are truly heart-broken over Nature’s way of purging herself from time to time from far too many anthropomorphic low-lifes.

The same hypocrites pouring tears and dollars over the heads of hapless Indonesians are indifferent to equal numbers of mostly dead civilians killed by the man-made disaster in Iraq, where more than a quarter of a mil1ion people have already perished during the war and the sanctions that led up to it. The same news media and government personalities who wring their hands in well-publicized humanitarian angst over victims of an act of God shed no tears for non-combatants bombed, shot, and incinerated in places like Faluja or Bagdad. While repeated images of weeping flood victims deluge American television screens, missing is any visual compassion for the men, women or children of Iraq, unlamented as anonymous "insurgents".

In truth, everybody is trying to exploit the 2004 tsunami for their own ends. Demented race-mixers and anti-White fanatics are using it to accelerate their miscegenation schedules on a worldwide scale. Liberal do-gooders jump at the chance to exorcise their demons of White self-hatred. Born-again missionaries are taking advantage of the situation to make converts with aid in one hand and a church tract in the other, blaming the sufferers for incurring divine wrath for following the wrong religion. More realistically, the Indonesian, Sri Lankan and Indian authorities coldly regard the event as a golden opportunity for foreign investment. Human life has always been cheap in so-called "Third World" countries, because it has so little racial value there. Why not profit from the circumstances, they reason, by milking it for all its sentimental worth from gullible Americans ashamed of their own skin color?

The natural event has also revealed something about the denizens in that part of the globe in the 21st Century. United States Army helicopters delivering supplies to tribesmen living in the remote hills of Indonesia were fired upon by naked savages using bows and arrows. Throughout the flood-ravaged region, gangs of rapists have violated so many women and girls, mothers are hiding with their children amid the rubble.

The tsunami also points up modern Americans’ Jewized mentality, which assumes everything can be solved with money. Of the half-a-billion U.S. tax dollars given the Somoza government thirty years ago for earthquake relief in Nicaragua, less than $100,000 was actually used to help rebuild the country. The rest vanished into private bank accounts around the world. The same thing happens whenever American suckers dump their conscience-stricken cash into any non-White hole, whether it be in Central America or Indonesia.

By contrast, when Rumania suffered a bad earthquake in 1943, Hitler gave no money, but ordered his army field medics, Wehrmacht engineers, and Luftwaffe transport planes loaded with food and clothing to the victims, who recovered in a matter weeks -- this in the middle of his desperate struggle to save Europe and the world from Stalin’s communist war-machine. Of course, the Fuehrer’s generosity will not be highlighted in Steven Spielberg’s next feature film, so the masses of our people will remain in ignorance -- which is the goal of the ruling Jewocracy that is the real catastrophe of our times.

How can you claim you’re for freedom, when the Nazis in Germany burned books?

During the "Roaring Twenties", pornography blossomed into a major industry for the first time in Germany. Books defaming and denigrating national heroes like Goethe or Wagner replaced standard school texts condemned as "politically incorrect", while any contrary information about race or the Jews could not get published. After Adolf Hitler was elected to power on 30 January 1933, a popular wave of nation-wide resentment arose against this formerly shameful state of affairs, and the real story of what happened has been profusely documented in David Irving’s 1996 book, "Goebbels, Mastermind of the Third Reich".

Irving shows that self-organized groups of mostly college students across the country spontaneously delivered huge piles of sexually perverted magazines, Communist tracts and assorted anti-German materials to blazing garbage dumps where these reams of ink-stained toilet paper rightly belonged. No Reich government official had ordered the bonfires or participated in the demonstration, except Dr. Joseph Goebbels, who was invited by the students to make a single, ten-minute, impromptu speech at the University of Berlin after the flames had already been lit. Even so, he was sharply criticized thereafter by both friends and foes alike for his brief participation. Millions of people in the outside world were subsequently misled by newsreel narrator, Lowell Thomas, and other Gentile front-men, to believe that Hitler was burning all books not published by the Nazis. Uninformed observers were given the impression that after the Bible and all the plays of Shakespeare had been reduced to ashes, only "Mein Kampf’ would be left for anyone to read.

In fact, the Germans, recognized for centuries as the most literate people in Europe, were cleansing themselves of the same published filth with which the United States is currently awash. But no one outside the Third Reich was told that the European equivalents of "Hustler" magazine or Howard Stern’s "Private Parts" had been purged from German culture to make way for something better. While Hitler-hating hypocrites still deplore his so-called "burning of the books", any published discussion of racial differences, impartial views of National Socialism, criticism of the Jews or race-mixing is kept from the public at large.

A case in point was Irving’s "Goebbels"’ book mentioned above. Although hostile to his subject, the author dared question claims that six million Jews had been exterminated on Hitler’s order. The manuscript had nonetheless been accepted for publication by a major company (St. Martin’s Press), and was actually in production, when death threats from irate Jews literally stopped the presses and killed the book. There are many numerous other examples, all rather typical. A few years before the Irving case, several thousand copies of A1red Rosenberg’s "Myth of the 20th Century" were privately printed and stored in a warehouse that was torched by Jewish Defense League arsonists. Every copy was lost.

Americans are unaware (don’t care?) that every major and mid-sized publisher in their country offers as a standard contract to authors specifically stating that nothing construed by the editors as "racist" or "pro-fascist" will be allowed to be printed. Throughout Europe, National Socialist authors who attempt to publish their views, even in limited press runs, risk arrest, fines and imprisonment. Immediately after World War Two, the Allied "liberators" of conquered Germany banned and burned literally hundreds of thousands of books – most of which had little or nothing to do with "Nazism".

As someone once observed, "Freedom of the press belongs to those who own one."

Do the colors of the Swastika flag mean anything?

The black Swastika represents the soil of our homelands – those territories where Aryan men and women have connected with the Earth through generations of toil, and impacted it with their unique culture.

The white disk stands for our mission -- eternal preservation of our people’s racial integrity.

The red field simultaneously signifies the revolutionary character of our National Socialist Movement and the sacrifices made on its behalf -- past, present and future.

Because of your racial views, would National Socialists have sided with the South during the American Civil War?

The Confederacy’s Secretary of State was an international lawyer, Judah P. Benjamin. He was also an agent for the House of Rothschild, the world’s most powerful banking firm. Its directors extended financial support to all European governments and controlled them with high-interest loans. Indebted monarches were personally unconcerned, because payment could always be left to their successors. But in so doing, they allowed the House of Rothschild to tighten its grip on future generations.

Seeking to extend their financial domination over America, the bankers lavished money and war supplies on the needy South in the venerable game of Divide and Conquer. They had neither interest in nor sympathy for Southern problems, but saw the Civil War only as an opportunity to economically conquer the New World, just as they had the Old. However, their schemes were seriously threatened immediately after the Confederate collapse by Abraham Lincoln. To heal post-war wounds, he forbade any vindictive action against Southerners, and ordered their amiable reintroduction into the United States as fellow Americans. In "emancipating" the Negroes, he had disenfranchised them, making it possible for him to repatriate the blacks to Africa – specifically, Liberia, which had already been set up by his predecessor, Thomas Jefferson, for just such a purpose.

Lincoln was in the process of creating a united, all-White America when he was assassinated by House of Rothschild operatives. His murder was followed by the horrors of "Reconstruction", when the South was plundered on such a revengeful scale, President Ulysses S. Grant was forced to issue a White House decree specifically aimed against the exploitative excesses of "Jewish carpet-baggers". But not even a presidential order was sufficient to prevent their brethren from incrementally gaining dominance over the wealth, politics and culture of the United States. As such, the Civil War, 'and particularly its aftermath, represented the great turning-point in American history, marking the real beginning of the Jewocracy that runs our country today.

That conflict set the stage for all subsequent military involvement, wherein Gentiles were and are duped into imagining they fulfill their patriotic duty, when they actual sacrifice themselves to bring about the ulterior goals of low-profile Jews, like today’s Paul Wolfowitz. In such wars, both Gentile sides are guaranteed defeat, no matter who is the apparent victor. Southerners suffered for generations under the injustice and poverty of "Reconstruction", as the North fell into a deep economic depression that caused vast unemployment and disease epidemics, claiming more lives on both sides of the Mason-Dixon Line than the recently concluded war.

While other Confederate leaders languished in jail or stood trial for "crimes against humanity", Judah P. Benjamin booked first-class passage to England, where he resumed his lucrative law practice, living in luxury for the rest of his days. The real winner of the Civil War had disappeared over the sea.

After the recent release of a movie about Howard Hughes, some critics described him as a "Nazi". If true, were other Hollywood film makers favorably disposed toward National Socialism?

Howard Hughes is still despised by mostly old Reds who cannot forgive him for testifying at the House Committee on Un-American Activities against Communists, most of them Jews. A truly great American genius, his understanding and hatred of the Chosen Ones has been well-documented ( www.popmatters.com/film/reviews/h/howard-hughes-real-aviator.shtml   -39k).

A Hollywood artist of the first rank unquestionably sympathetic to our Idea was Walt Disney (Neil Gabler, "An Empire of their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood", NY: Anchor Books, 1988). He often attended Los Angeles meetings of William Dudley Pelley’s National Socialist-style Silver Shirts during the 1930s, was active in the America First Committee to prevent Roosevelt from going to war against Hitler’s Germany, and kept Walt Disney Productions Jew-free, so long as he lived. Pelley had played an important role in Hollywood himself, as the foremost screenwriter of the 1920s. His best-remembered script was for Lon Chancy’s "The Hunchback of Notre Dame".

Charles Higham’s "Errol Flynn, the Untold Story" (NY: Dell, 1980) describes the silver screen’s dashing Robin Hood as a devoted admirer of Adolf Hitler, although accusations that Flynn was "a Gestapo agent" are more probably wishful thinking (on our part!).

More certain was the open admiration expressed for the National Socialist Revolution by Vincent Price ("Vincent Price, A Daughter’s Biography", by Victoria Price, NY: St. Martin’s Press, 1999), even before the Third Reich was born. In 1932, during a visit to Vienna, he observed that the Austrians "are ruled by the Jews, who tax them to excess ... Three hundred small boys called the ‘Hitlerknabe’ are marching outside and singing. From the spirit here and the faith in the man (Hitler) and the lack of faith in Austria, which is completely under the control of the Pope and Judea, I feel he must be right, and at least it (National Socialism) is a direct appeal to the right emotion in man, love for his brother." His daughter recalled, "Vincent liked to tell friends that his visit to Nuremberg had coincided with the famous National Party Day rally immortalized by Leni Riefenstahl in ‘Triumph of the Will’, that he had heard Hitler speak ...". The Fuehrer, she writes, was her father’s "hero", until it became clear to Vincent that continued admiration for "the greatest man in two thousand years" would sabotage his career in kosher Hollywood.

Another famous performer whose independent thinking got him into trouble during the early 1960s was the witty comedian, Jonathan Winters. After ad-libing a hilarious routine ridiculing Negro race-mixers and their shady benefactor, a "Mr. Goldie", Winters claimed to have suffered a "nervous breakdown", and ducked into a psychiatric hospital to escape charges of "racism" and "anti-Semitism", when the privately recorded skit was leaked to the outside world.

A more recent British performer to suffer the scourge of Juda was Vanessa Redgrave. Despite her efforts on behalf of Soviet Jews, for which she was awarded the Sakharev Medal, effigies of the actress were burned outside CBS studios in both Hollywood and Philadelphia as part of a nationwide campaign to stigmatize Miss Redgrave as "rabidly anti-Semitic", in 1980. Even when she starred in the role of a concentration camp in-mate in "Playing for Time", a movie made for television, the studios were ticketed by chanting, menacing thugs of the Jewish Defense League, led by Irv Rudin. "It's a horrible insult," he frothed (  www.rense.com/general140/ani.htm  -19K). "Six million Jews will roll over in their graves! We will not cease until nobody will have the guts to hire her ever again!" Despite Miss Redgrave’s pleas to the contrary, she was hounded by incensed Yiddles wherever she went. Under pressure, the Boston Symphony Orchestra canceled a performance of "Oedipus Rex" in which she performed. Her only "crime" in the evil eyes of Rudin and his fellow tribesmen was to have financed and narrated "The Palestinian", a film sympathetic to the awful plight of Gentiles in the Near East. While the documentary showed Israeli aggression against the sorely victimized Palestinian people (not exactly a secret), it could hardly have been construed as "anti-Jewish". Nonetheless, in a world where only the Jews are immune from criticism, Vanessa Redgrave’s career had been savaged.

Another European performer with an international reputation, Bridget Bardot, was convicted by a Paris court last June for "incitement of racial hatred" for expressing her personal opinions in a new book. She was fined $6,600 for writing that La Belle France was being dismantled by waves of smelly, crime-prone colored immigrants who knew nothing of European Civilization. Le Rocher, the publisher of "A Scream in the Silence", was fined an additional $6,000, and ordered to pay, together with Bardot, for advertisements in two major (and, hence, costly) newspapers announcing their own conviction. Undaunted, she defiantly told the court that France was being miscegenated out of existence, and condemned race-mixing in no uncertain terms. "I was born in 1934," she explained. "At that time, inter-racial marriage wasn't approved of." The verdict was the fourth such judgement against her on similar charges since 1997. ( www.amren.comlnews/news04/06/10/bardot.html  - 36k)

Last year, Mel Gibson was similarly crucified as "anti-Semitic" because, introducing his film, "The Passion", he tried to follow the New Testament version of Christ’s execution to the biblical letter. Having done anything less because of outside pressure would have amounted to censoring the Word of God to satisfy Jewish intolerance. Gibson did not write the dialogue for his Jesus character to say, "If my kingdom did belong to this world, my attendants would be fighting to keep me from being handed over to the Jews." (John 18,36). Or have a mob of Jews exclaim, "His blood be upon us and our children!" (Matthew 27, 25). If the Jews are upset by lines such as these, they must protest to their Author, not Mr. Gibson.

The popular screen actor, Robert Mitchim, assured his place in Hollywood early during his career by starring in a propaganda farce, "Crossfire", aimed at demonizing the postwar popularity of "anti-Semitism" in America. But people can and do change, and he spoke the truth after appearing in another twisted Jewish version of reality. When interviewed about his performance in Jew Herman Wouk’s "The Winds of War", Mitchim stated bluntly that the pseudo-documentary was "a travesty on history. There was nothing ‘noble’ about our involvement in World War Two. It was a sham from the beginning". America entered World War Two, he said, chiefly to stimulate our depression-ridden economy with arms production: "That was the alpha and omega af the whole mess." Mitchim went on to say that the alleged "extermination" of six million lovable Jews by Hitler was "a political fairy-tale".

Before thus committing career-hari-kari, Mitchim was an unabashed racist. He told fellow movie star, Shirley MacLaine, of his younger days on a Georgia chain-gang, when "he was shackled to ‘some nigger’, with whom he became friendly." ("My Lucky Stars", by Shirley MacLaine, NY: Bantam Books, 1995; pgs. 293, 294, 307, 329, 330) Mitchim escaped. "He described ‘feeling like a nigger being chased right before they lynched him’." Mitchim told her, "They’ll just go after some other poor nigger to fill their quota on the chain-gang." Years later, he and MacLaine were together in East Africa, "commiserating with the Whites who had been through Uhuru and the Mau-Mau insurgence."

She is herself not unaware of the Jews who use Hollywood to manipulate public opinion and mould mass behavior. Miss MacLaine went as far as she dared, when she wrote that "perhaps manipulation of Hollywood began around the poker tables in Palm Springs, years ago, with the attendance of Jack Warner (Warner Brothers), Samuel Goldwyn (Samuel Goldwyn Productions), Harry Cohn (Columbia), Barney Balaban (Paramount), Joe Schenck (20th Century Fox), Darryl Zanuck (Fox), and Louis B. Mayer (MGM) ... They controlled Hollywood ... they desired to manipulate the public. In the main, they were of Eastern European descent [a transparent euphemism for "Jewish". AVS] and wished to create the reality of the New World as they wanted it to be ... They played fast and loose with the truth, and somehow it was acceptable." That "New World" was the world of lies and terror in which we live today.

It was hardly surprising then, when Marlon Brando told a national television audience on 5 April 1996, "Hollywood is run by Jews. It is owned by Jews, and they should have a greater sensitivity about the issue of people who are suffering. You will see every other kind of race and nationality stereotyped in Hollywood films," the veteran actor stated on "Larry King Live", "but we never saw the kike, because they know perfectly well that's where you draw the wagons around."

Abraham H. Foxman, National Director of the Jews’ own "Gestapo" -- the Anti-Defamation League – said of Brando's contention that Hollywood was Jewish, "Even though this may technically be a reality, it is also considered an anti-Semitic statement, because it is perceived to bolster that old canard used by genuine anti-Semites -- that of a Jewish conspiracy to run the world (That "New World" of the Hollywood Heebs Shirley MacLaine mentioned? AVS). Mr. Brando owes an apology to the Jewish men and women who work in Hollywood for vilifying them, and to all Jews for his stereotyping and use of an anti-Semitic epithet."

While preparing to play the role of George Lincoln Rockwell in an installment of the 1970s’ anti-White propaganda extravaganza, "Roots", perhaps the actor’s racial conscience had been awakened by something he may have read by the Commander of the American Nazi Party. In the previous decade, Brando had demonstrated for black "civil rights". ( www.adl.org/ PresRele/AUSUS_12/2708_12.asp -19K)

Like the star of "The Godfather", Charlton Heston was an early activist for Negro "civil rights" who later wised up ( www.ypc.org/nrainfolheston.html - 7K). Toward the close of the last century, this cinematic Moses told the Free Congress Foundation's 20th Anniversary Gala, on 7 December 1997, that "a cultural war is raging across our land, storming our values, assaulting our freedoms, killing our self-confidence in who we are and what we believe, where we come from. Heaven help the God-fearing, law-abiding, Caucasian, or even worse -- rural, apparently straight, or -- even worse -- admittedly heterosexual, gun-owning or -- even worse – NRA-card-carrying, average working stiff, or – even worse -- male working stiff, because not only don't you count, you're a downright obstacle to social progress. Your tax dollars may be just as delightfully green as you hand them over, but your voice requires a lower decibel level, your opinion is less enlightened, your media access is insignificant, and frankly, mister, you need to wake up, wise up and learn a little something about your new America – in fact, why don't you just sit down and shut up?

"The Constitution was handed down to guide us by a bunch of those wise old dead White guys who invented this country. Now, some flinch when I say that. Why? It's true. They were White guys. So were most of the guys who died in Lincoln's name opposing slavery in the 1860s. So why should I be ashamed of White guys? Why is ‘Hispanic pride’ or ‘Black pride’ a good thing, while ‘White pride’ conjures up shaved heads and white hoods? Now, Chuck Heston can get away with saying I'm proud of those wise old dead White guys, because Jesse Jackson and Louie Farrakhan know I fought in their cultural war. I was one of the first White soldiers in the civil rights movement in 1961, long before it was fashionable in Hollywood -- believe me – or in Washington, for that matter. In 1963, I marched on Washington with Dr. Martin Luther King to uphold the Bill of Rights. But you don't see many other Hollywood luminaries speaking out on this one, do you? It's not because there aren't any. It’s because they can't afford the heat. They dare not speak up for fear of CNN or the IRS or SAG or the ATF or NBC or even W.J.C (the World Jewish Congress). It saps the strength of our country when the personal price is simply too high to stand up for what you believe in.

"Nobody opposed the obscene rapper,` ‘Ice-T’, until I stood at Time-Warner's stockholders meeting, and was ridiculed by its president for wanting to take the floor to read Ice-T’s lyrics. Since I held several hundred shares of stock, he had no choice, though the media were barred. I read those lyrics to a stunned audience of average American people -- the stockholders -- who were shocked at the lyrics that advocate killing cops, sexually abusing women, and raping the nieces of our Vice-President.

"Mainstream America is depending on you -- counting on you -- to draw your sword and fight for them. These people have precious little time or resources to battle misguided Cinderella attitudes, the fringe propaganda of the blacks who raise a militant fist with one hand while they seek preference with the other. We've reached that point in time when our national social policy originates on Oprah. I say it's time to pull the plug.

"Americans should not have to go to war every morning for their values. They already go to war for their families. They fight to hold down a job, raise responsible kids, make their payments, keep gas in the car, put food on the table and clothes on their backs, and still save a little for their final days in dignity. They prefer the America they built – where you could be White without feeling guilty, own a gun without shame, and raise your hand without apology. They are the critical masses who find themselves under siege and are longing for you to get some guts, stand on principle, and lead them to victory in this cultural war.

"In a cultural war, triumph belongs to those who arm themselves with pride in who they are and then do the right thing. Not the most expedient thing, not the politically correct thing, not what'll sell, but the right thing. Don't run for cover when the cultural cannons roar! Remember who you are and what you believe, and then raise your hand, stand up, and speak out! Don't be shamed or startled into lockstep conformity by seemingly powerful people! The maintenance of a free nation is a long, slow, steady process. And it is in your hands. But as leaders you must – we must – do as Lincoln would do, confronted with the stench of cultural war: Do what's right. As Mr. Lincoln said, ‘With firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right, let us finish the work we are in ... and then we shall save our country.’

"Defeat the criminals and their apologists, oust the biased and bigoted, disavow the self-appointed social engineers whose relentless arrogance fuels this vicious war against so much we hold so dear! Do not yield, do not divide, do not call a truce! Be fair, but fight back!"

In a recent issue of The New Order, a Rev. Richard Butler was eulogized. Who was this man?

With the passing of Rev. Butler last September (2004), National Socialists and White Americans of good will everywhere lost one of their oldest and dearest friends. As the founder and leader of Aryan Nations, he provided a unique umbrella organization for comrades from all over the world.

Richard G. Butler was born in 1918, in southern California, where he grew up to attend Los Angeles City College, graduating with a degree in aeronautical engineering. Something of an aviation pioneer during the 1930s, he was co-inventor of rapid repair for tubeless tires, a patented process that saved the lives of countless Allied airmen in World War Two. Deeply patriotic, Butler enlisted in the U.S. Air Force after Pearl Harbor, serving as a valued flight instructor. During the postwar era, he organized and operated a machine plant for the production and precision machining of automotive parts and engine assemblies, plus aircraft components. In 1968, he became Senior Manufacturing Engineer for the Lockheed Aircraft Company at its Palmdale, California plant, where he participated in the development of the renowned L-1011 aircraft.

Throughout his successful career as an aviation executive, he had grown increasingly troubled by the obvious decline of American society, particularly since the Second World War. Using the same kind of scientific research he applied to aviation, Butler concluded that the White Race was in mortal danger of becoming extinct. The only alternative was National Socialism, born from the genius of history’s greatest martyr for truth in two thousand years. Butler resigned from his prestigious position at Lockheed in 1986, and raised our sacred Swastika over his privately owned citadel in Coer d’Alene, Idaho.

It was a particularly courageous decision for a man in his seventies. "No one is too young or too old to fight for his race," he bristled whenever anyone pointed out his already advanced age. "Individual human existence is short, and I want to do something of real value with my life before it’s done. Men as old as me and older did not hesitate to fight the Soviet invaders of Eastern Europe in Hitler’s Volksturm. I’ll never be too old to fight the colored invaders of America."

Butler was devoutly religious, but rejected mainstream Christianity as antithetical to the principles of its founder, and preached his own version of spirituality. Over the next fifteen years, his nineteen-acre estate served as the world’s most prominent National Socialist headquarters during the late 20th Century. The Pastor’s graciousness and generosity made it a congenial oasis of calm sanity in an outside world gone mad with race mixing degeneracy.

Beginning in the late 1980s, he mounted a unique, annual demonstration, when hundreds of men and women from across America paraded through the streets of Coer d’Alene, each one carrying the flag of their own nationality. Every mid-summer, this otherwise obscure little Idaho town drew global attention in a colorful display of White unity. It also attracted hysterical opposition orchestrated by the gargoyle-faced boss of the Jewish Defense (sic) League. But local people were hardly charmed by the vociferous Irv Rudin (rhymes with "Juden") and his fellow loud-mouths, come all the way from New York City looking for trouble, and quite literally foaming at the lips with revenge. They were more favorably impressed with the Gentile marchers’ self-controlled, even dignified demeanor under pressure. From these yearly dramatizations of racial solidarity a new name for Rev. Butler’s struggle naturally arose: Aryan Nations.

By the late 1990s, it had become the most visible expression of White resistance on earth, serving as common ground for numerous National Socialist and racialist organizations. The Swastika banner flying atop its high tower shone out like a defiant beacon of hope, calling growing numbers of adherents from around the world. But such defiance and growth, however lawful, was intolerable to the kosher powers-that-be, and they exerted the full weight of their monstrous legal system against Pastor Butler. Where physical violence, news-media provocation and government intimidation had failed to stop him, subversion and money -- the Jews’ immemorial tactic and weapon – would succeed. In 1999, court proceedings were brought against Aryan Nations by Morris Dees, a "civil rights" attorney from Montgomery, Alabama, who makes his living by suing White patriots and impoverishing them. Over the last twenty-five years, he bankrupted half-a-dozen racialist organizations, including the Ku Klux Klan and White Aryan Resistance. Dees’ self-styled "Southern Poverty Law Center" is reportedly bankrolled to the tune of sixty-five million dollars. It was this well-heeled behemoth that now unleashed its awful financial power on the former U.S. Air Force flight instructor.

Edgar J. Steele represented Rev. Butler in court, although he did not share his elderly client’s racial views. Steele nevertheless stated honestly, "At trial, I was flabbergasted by the lies told by witnesses who had been bought and paid for by Morris Dees and company. Because of the endless media vilification, and despite our having proven up so many of those lies, the jury chose to slap Pastor Butler with the most ridiculous verdict I have ever seen. Idaho's bond requirement made it impossible for us to appeal. For what it is worth, I was in the trial and at his side every step of the way. We put up an excellent fight, the best of my career. We beat Dees at every turn. We beat him on the law. We beat him on the facts.

"What we couldn't beat was the passion and prejudice of the community, as reflected in the minds of the jurors. Some of them spoke to the press afterwards, recounting how they considered not one shred of evidence, not one factual issue, not one legal principle, in immediately resolving to bankrupt Pastor Butler, so that he would leave north Idaho. For that, the press is largely accountable, as it had been conducting a relentless war of disinformation against Butler and his followers for years.

‘Not once did I observe Pastor Butler raise his voice or disparage another who was unjustifiably hounding or maligning him or those he loved. Always, I was struck by the disparity between his public image and the man I knew. I know from personal experience that one cannot believe anything one reads in the media concerning such a man, however. Current reporting, especially from the local Spokane newspaper, which has chosen to boorishly, crudely and falsely mock the man in death, has borne this out with a vengeance. Always, the media endeavors to paint Butler as a criminal never jailed because he managed to dance just out of reach of the authorities. In reality, he was never jailed because he never did anything wrong. Unless you view speaking your mind and standing by your principles to be wrong. ’Are you a White supremacist?’, I asked Pastor Butler one day. ‘No,’ he responded, ‘I am a White separatist. I don't wish harm to befall other races. I just want to be able to live apart from them.’

"Richard Butler had a large number of followers all around the globe, most of whom genuinely loved him. A much larger number of the local population here in north Idaho thought more well of him than the media would have you believe. I know, because they continually come up to me and say so, though they might not admit such even to their own families."

The seizure of Aryan Nations’ Coer d’Alene headquarters proved to be a hollow victory for its enemies. A short time later, Irv Rudin, while under investigation by the F.B.I., tried to commit suicide by shooting himself in the head. The botched attempt reduced him to a life-long vegetable. The movement he, Morris Dees and all the others who strove with personal violence and financial power to shut down is in far better shape than the moribund Jewish Defense League and its comatose boss, as this web-site attests. Because they themselves are crass materialists, our enemies are incapable of understanding that our Idea cannot be extinguished by annihilating its physical existence. Nothing they do can exceeds the destruction suffered by the Third Reich. Yet, sixty years later, the ideology that created it has survived and spread around the world.

Richard Butler passed away at the end of a long, productive and ultimately heroic life, content in the awareness that he did everything he could for his race and nation. No man hath greater epitaph.

How many followers do you have?'

More than yesterday, but less than tomorrow! From the day Adolf Hitler founded National Socialism eighty five years ago, it has never rested on the dead weight of numbers, but is generated instead by a few White men and women embodying a majority of energy and will-power. Mein Kampf set down that the Movement comprises two fundamental categories of followers: "activists" and "supporters". The latter are persons favorably disposed to our Idea, who may assist with donations, etc., but are less personally involved in championing it than activists who risk their liberties and lives to promote this "philosophy of life".

More is expected of "activists", who are, consequently, far less numerous than "supporters", because fewer individuals are willing to put themselves in harm’s way for something greater than themselves. This does not mean that "supporters" are any less important to the success of our struggle. They form the bedrock of the Movement, upon which the activists stand. Together, they form the power-center of National Socialism. And while we are always seeking to broaden our supporter base, the ranks of "activists" will be forever thinned and honed into an ideological elite, not because of any special privileges, but entirely by the difficulty of the struggle in which they have voluntarily engaged.

Adolf Hitler began with seven men, including himself. Fifteen years later, he made a clear distinction between "supporters" and "activists", when he told half-a-million of his followers at their annual congress, "For the masses of our fellow countrymen, it is sufficient for them to say, ‘I believe’. But for us, our watchword has always been: ‘I fight!’"

How do your opponents envision America’s destiny?

The future is determined by forces set in motion during the past, unless they are diverted by present opposition. In a nutshell, Adolf Hitler’s struggle was fundamentally an attempt to transmute civilization’s centuries-long decay. His death in 1945 opened a final chapter in the Decline of the West, wherein American extinction is plainly written.

That’s just fine for liberals, who embrace every form of cultural rot as "progress" toward their old goal of "One World, One Race, One Government". They are pleased with our country’s present drift in that direction. For them, race-mixing is the True Faith they embrace with all the intolerance of religious fanatics. Persons so much as hinting a lack of enthusiasm for their inter-racial piety must be shamed and ostracized. Racism is the worst of all sins, far more serious than murder, meriting the most dire punishment, because it stands in the way of a future where all nations are dissolved under a single government authority, like the United Nations (except, of course, the term "nations" will no longer be politically correct). All other armies having fulfilled the Old Testament admonition to break their swords into plow-sharers, legions of blue-helmeted police will make sure that laws against all variations of racism are strictly enforced.

Concurrently, behavior-modification in schools, the entertainment industry and news media will use advanced technologies to psychologically program on-going generations against any inflection of racial self-awareness, thereby enabling interbreeding on a global scale. Once accomplished, and all ethnic identities have been blended into an inter-racial souffle, we may dispense with any kind of government whatsoever, because the human differences that formerly caused crime and unhappiness will no longer exist. Mankind ("Personkind" will be more "gender-friendly" then) will achieve its ultimate destiny, what it was meant to become, wherein everyone will look, act and think the same. There will be no differences of opinion, nor of any other kind.

Along with race, religion, politics and sexual behavior will be all alike and indistinguishable. People will be sensitive to the feelings of all others at a time when no one will risk offending anyone else; hence, the abolition of separate notions of any kind, except those that are socially acceptable. Those lucky Americans will be able to do whatever they please, so long as they do not hurt the feelings of others, regardless of any consequences, because a god-like technology will continually clean up after them.

Of course, such a future can exist only in the heads of demented liberals, and must culminate in circumstances entirely unlike their utopian fantasies. If present trends continue, America will approach its racial Rubicon around the middle of this century, when its majority population will no longer be White. Thereafter -- again, given any serious opposition -- White Americans’ minority status will dwindle at an accelerating pace, until colored immigration and inter-breeding will have shoved them into extinction sometime in the following century.

Long before then, the burden of supporting national economic life will have become too great for America to bear, because it was sustained by White labor, now in shorter supply. And since the same kind of people who originally created a constitutional republic will no longer possess majority status, it will be replaced by a totalitarian government of power-freaks more interested in enforcing liberal agendas than up-holding old fashioned notions of liberty.

In short, the liberals’ inter-racial dream is devolving into a world of political tyranny, economic misery and White death. As a measure of their sick mentality, they would prefer even those consequences to a world where people were conscious of their racial identities.

In opposition to the liberals, then, why not choose a conservative path?

Any differences today between liberals and conservatives are unimportant, because neither place any value on preserving the White Race. When a whole people is pushed toward the edge of extinction, all other issues dwindle to insignificance.

Both liberals and conservatives are so entirely dominated by Jewish money and influence that they are nothing more than compliant puppets jerking to the least whim of their kosher wire-puller. The "Neo-Cons" in government today are power-mad race-mixers who wrap their intolerance in a religious hysteria that justifies and exonerates any excess, as witness the suicidal war in Iraq; the wholesale torture of defenseless, even innocent captives; and the visible transformation of America’s Constitutional Republic into a fundamentalist tyranny.

Contrary to the conservatives, whose bank accounts seem more valuable than the racial integrity of their people, National Socialists alone enjoy the intellectual freedom of a rational worldview unfettered by political correctness, and inspired by a realistic idealism for the future of our race.

Do National Socialists believe in evolution?

Given the present human condition of Western Civilization, it is far easier to believe these days in DE-evolution. Instead of bringing together its most intelligent, brave and creative individuals, the Aryan Race is being deliberately bred out of existence by a universal, unrelenting campaign in American schools and all forms of public information to promote miscegenation. Indiscriminate breeding among cattle devalues the herd into scrub bulls, just as unions between Whites and colored races result in evolutionary backsliding toward genetic decay.

White people are alone capable of producing civilization. Without it, all humanity would sink into filth, sickness and bloodshed -- the very qualities currently over-taking America, as it becomes inundated with burgeoning colored populations. These anthropomorphic races are just wild animals, not true human beings. Left to themselves, without simpering White liberals to care for them, they rapidly decline into squalor and barbarism. Breeding with such low-lifes can only drag down the elite White Race into savagery, as dramatically attested by the deteriorating status of America’s cities, where non-Aryans congregate like flies on putrescence.

Evolution is not just a theory, but a demonstrable fact of life, Any child can see the relationship between the skeletons of an ape and a man. They both quite obviously share a common evolution, of which the human is the more mentally developed species. So too, homo sapiens-sapiens, or "modern man", is a decided intellectual improvement over his predecessors -- Neanderthal, homo erectus mauretanicus, etc., etc. It is apparent that the "life-force", as George Bernard Shaw described it, is trying to evolve a smarter being.

We are mistaken, however, in imagining that Negro pygmies, Indonesian head-hunters, Polynesian cannibals and all the other non-Whites are only just behind us in terms of evolution, and must be given a chance to catch up with us. We do not share the same path with these ape-like creatures, nor are they coming up behind us on the evolutionary trail. Instead, they have been genetically sidetracked as human offshoots into evolutionary cul-de-sacs. The path they trod is a dead end, just as many other sub-species before them. They are mere developmental debris to be brushed aside and discarded like the chips and shav